Re: kernel 2.4.23 problem

From: Steve Fraser (syz@sakhalin.ru)
Date: Fri Jan 02 2004 - 02:27:15 EET

  • Next message: Tony Schonfeld: "Re: kernel 2.4.23 problem"

    Hi All,

    > The best long term fix is to upgrade to 2.6.0 (or newer), as the 2.6.x
    > kernel has numerous bug fixes. No offense to 9a4gl but as far as I know
    > his patch does not fix everything that Ralf and Joeron (sp?) have been
    > working on.
    >
    That's disappointing - my 2.4 system has had a windows-like unreliability
    ever since I upgraded from 2.2! I needed some of the advanced routing
    features in 2.4, otherwise I would have gone back a long time ago. I'm just
    in the middle of applying the 9a4gl patches - I'd hoped it'd fix everything
    :-(

    BTW the fix to mheardd helped a bit - I'd definitely recommend it. My system
    will typically survive for a week now!

    > The reason it is flakey under 2.4.x (for some people) is that some
    > basic or fundemental assumptions changed between 2.2.x and 2.4.x and
    > at the time no one made the necessary changes to AX.25 and the device
    > drivers. So some people will be bit by these bugs while others get
    > luckily and don't see them (faster, more complex setups, especially
    > gateways seem to be affected the most).
    >
    I certainly qualify for "complex setup/gateway"!

    I guess 2.6 is my next step.

    Thanks for the "heads up"

    Steve

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hams" in
    the body of a message to yhfhkav@popp.net
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Jan 02 2004 - 02:25:59 EET