Re: [PATCH] ax25, netrom and rose fixes for 2.6.0

From: Jeroen Vreeken (wrs.mmxzyjawv@astberlin.de)
Date: Wed Dec 24 2003 - 18:39:47 EET

  • Next message: David S. Miller: "Re: [PATCH] ax25, netrom and rose fixes for 2.6.0"

    On 2003.12.23 23:10:15 +0100 Bernard Pidoux F6BVP wrote:
    >
    > I just tried to compile FPAC 3.25 and FBB 7.04j against kernel 6.0 just
    > to see how compilation would perform.
    > Although I was sure there would be a number of obsolete code and that
    > the programs will not run.
    >
    > I had to modify a few #includes.
    >
    > Replacing for example
    >
    > #include <linux/ax25.h> by "netax25/kernel_ax25.h"
    > #include <linux/rose.h> by "netax25/kernel_rose.h"
    > #include <linux/netrom.h> by "netax25/kernel_netrom.h"
    >
    > helped the compilation.
    >
    > However in kernel_ax25.h I found that
    > #define AX25_PIDINCL 8
    > that was in former ax25.h was no more defined.
    >
    > I guess this was removed on purpose ?
    > Am I wrong ?

    AX25_PIDINCL is a socket option for the ax25 stack...
    I am guessing that your kernel_ax25.h file is from a time that that didn't
    exist yet.....

    What exactly went wrong with the header files from linux?

    Jeroen

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hams" in
    the body of a message to rpsaic@vanja.com
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed Dec 24 2003 - 18:25:44 EET