Re: [PATCH] ax25, netrom and rose fixes for 2.6.0

From: Bernard Pidoux F6BVP (terhi.victor@logonet.com)
Date: Wed Dec 24 2003 - 00:10:15 EET

  • Next message: Jeroen Vreeken: "Re: [PATCH] ax25, netrom and rose fixes for 2.6.0"

    I just tried to compile FPAC 3.25 and FBB 7.04j against kernel 6.0 just
    to see how compilation would perform.
    Although I was sure there would be a number of obsolete code and that
    the programs will not run.

    I had to modify a few #includes.

    Replacing for example

    #include <linux/ax25.h> by "netax25/kernel_ax25.h"
    #include <linux/rose.h> by "netax25/kernel_rose.h"
    #include <linux/netrom.h> by "netax25/kernel_netrom.h"

    helped the compilation.

    However in kernel_ax25.h I found that
    #define AX25_PIDINCL 8
    that was in former ax25.h was no more defined.

    I guess this was removed on purpose ?
    Am I wrong ?

    73 de Bernard, F6BVP

    -------------------------

    Jeroen Vreeken wrote:

    > Hi,
    >
    > These are a few fixes for bugs I encountered over the last few weeks:
    >
    > - Fix some socket locking in ax25
    > - Fix a waitqueue bug in ax25
    > - Use sock_orphan in ax25
    > - Fix a waitqueue bug in netrom
    > - Fix a waitqueue bug in rose
    > - Fix raw socket behaviour in ax25
    >
    > Ralf, can you give your stamp of approval so Dave can apply them?
    >
    > Jeroen

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hams" in
    the body of a message to ditdl@viva.tv
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed Dec 24 2003 - 00:10:28 EET