From: Cathryn Mataga (qnpnf.frpzdfkb@kerailya.tunkki.fi)
Date: Mon Sep 01 2003 - 23:29:40 EEST
Tihomir Heidelberg wrote:
>
> I made a lot of fixes, some of them are implemented in 2.6.0-testX, too.
> Some of fixes in my patch are stolen from boys working on 2.6 kernel.
> When I posted here the info about my patch before more then month ago, there
> were still big problems in kernel... Now I am running patched 2.4.21 more then
> 15 days without crash, think it is ready to be merged in some of next
> 2.4 kernel releases...
> so, those having crashes (even protocol problems), try this patch:
> ftp://ham2.cc.fer.hr/pub/users/9a4gl/9a4gl-ax25-2421-20030831.patch
> the patch is against clean 2.4.21, so do not apply this patch if you
> have patched kernel with any of my previous patches
Well, thanks for working on this. So, then let me get this straight. The
most stable option is to get 2.4.21 and patch it with your patch, and that's
different from 2.4.22, right?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hams" in
the body of a message to fdbmgvke@mx.dy.fi
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Sep 01 2003 - 23:30:50 EEST