From: John A. Magliacane (vrzvqlnw.gjyc@neteffx.net)
Date: Mon Mar 17 2003 - 21:51:16 EET
Hi Folks.
When viewing routing tables, is S-L-O-W response (several minutes on
a PII, 225 MHz, 2.4.19 kernel) to the /sbin/route command normal, or
is it an indication of a misconfiguration? I have two Linux-based
routers with two Ethernet interfaces, static routing, iptable filtering
and NATing, etc., and both respond VERY SLOWLY when viewing the routing
table. /sbin/route responds VERY quickly, however, if a default route
is either not specified or removed from the routing table. The iptable
filter doesn't seem to matter (however one machine takes a VERY long
time (several minutes) to initialize my iptable rules at boot-up).
Despite this, both machines seem to route and filter packets quite
nicely. I'm just curious whether the slow response I'm observing
is normal, or an indication of a problem.
Thanks in advance...
73, de John, KD2BD
=====
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- John A. Magliacane, KD2BD -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Internet : lhsi@musku.net | Video : 426.250 MHz/439.250 MHz
Satellite : UoSAT-OSCAR-22 | Morse : -.- -.. ..--- -... -..
Voice : +1.732.224.2948 | WWW : http://www.qsl.net/kd2bd/
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Linux Doesn't Cost. It Pays. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Platinum - Watch CBS' NCAA March Madness, live on your desktop!
http://platinum.yahoo.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hams" in
the body of a message to hofis.ujeyrdoqwo@adi.com.tw
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Mar 17 2003 - 21:51:30 EET