Re: node "Connection refused"

From: Tomi Manninen (jhjtxo.hurvmql@isogmbh.de)
Date: Sat Feb 22 2003 - 19:33:31 EET

Next message: vlndzb.fbygd@hartfordlife.com: "Re: soundmodem / "SIOCSIFFLAGS no such device""

Previous message: Craig Small: "Re: [PATCH] node and libax25io nonblocking"
In reply to: Gérard Parat / F6FGZ: "node "Connection refused""
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sat, 22 Feb 2003, Gérard Parat / F6FGZ wrote:

> uhf2: fm F4BWT-10 to F6FGZ-12 ctl I32^ pid=CF(NET/ROM) len 20 11:33:38
> NET/ROM: F4BWT-10->F6FGZ-12 ttl 15
> conn ack: ur ckt 01/07 my ckt 00/00 wnd 4 CHOKE

F4BWT-10 responds with "CONN ACK / CHOKE" which is the NET/ROM equivalent
for "connection refused". So I think your node works just fine.

Are you sure F4BWT-10 should answer?

-- Tomi Manninen Internet: ngutoq.iosnkvd@e-vei.no OH2BNS AX.25: smfh.rhjeduzn@roskapostia.tunk.net KP20ME04 Amprnet: saqwx.vcnreclxss@customer17.rudanet.pl

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hams" in the body of a message to gmn@e-nt.net More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Next message: uupoonn.ofkuevkh@mailit.tunk.net: "Re: soundmodem / "SIOCSIFFLAGS no such device""
Previous message: Craig Small: "Re: [PATCH] node and libax25io nonblocking"
In reply to: Gérard Parat / F6FGZ: "node "Connection refused""
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Feb 22 2003 - 20:00:53 EET