From: Tomi Manninen (johpw@upcfrance.com)
Date: Tue Feb 18 2003 - 00:13:48 EET
On Mon, 17 Feb 2003, Jeroen Vreeken wrote:
> The libax25 patch is basicly the same I posted a while back with the buffer
> check added and a few changes to axio_puts(), axio_gets() and
> axio_getline().
Question: is this different from the patch I sent you and Craig a few
months back? The version that should be in the CVS now (I haven't checked
the CVS).
The approach you have used for fixing node seems after a quick look
similar to what I had done, but there is one thing I need to discuss with
you. I'll get back to you on that later.
You have covered a few cases that I had missed but also you have a
few cases that I think are not needed. (It shouldn't be necessary to add
any extra select() loops or other blocking measures when the socket
already is blocking...)
More comments tomorrow.
-- Tomi Manninen Internet: scskbw@uni.opole.pl OH2BNS AX.25: zrf.iatzdzp@islea.energis.pl KP20ME04 Amprnet: ehbtduou@hull.sch.uk- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hams" in the body of a message to anzeyl.tfydxsasdu@twenty4help.se More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Feb 18 2003 - 00:19:40 EET