From: Curt Mills, WE7U (terhi.victor@logonet.com)
Date: Fri Jan 03 2003 - 00:58:38 EET
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Chuck Gelm wrote:
> However, my main issue is that I do not want to keep track of
> development revisions. My main issue is that I want the 'stable'
> version release and the 'stable' files. My original
> opinion that I posted here, was that Xastir is developmental
> code. Your posts seem to confirm this opinion.
hi hi
Think what you want, run what you want. You've got the facts now.
I have no control over what you do with them. ;-)
Everything we've ever released on SourceForge is still there
available for download, so run whatever version you prefer. Myself,
I'd choose the development version released 01/02/2003. It won't
fall over on you and has loads of new, very desirable features
compared to the february 2002 "stable" release. You're only hurting
yourself by choosing an earlier version, but again, it's your
choice. Expect another release in two weeks. And another. And
another.
"stable"/"development" have quite different meanings across
projects. In our case it should be "somewhat stable"/"more stable".
We'll probably release a new "stable" package sometime in the next
month or three, for those that can't force themselves to run
bleeding-edge software, and for the Linux distributions to pick up.
That's probably enough on this thread. Back to other more
interesting Linux ham stuff!
-- Curt Mills, WE7U apy.zxngpdhhxb@n2h2.com Senior Methods Engineer/SysAdmin "Lotto: A tax on people who are bad at math!" "Windows: Microsoft's tax on computer illiterates!" -- WE7U "The world DOES revolve around me: I picked the coordinate system!"- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hams" in the body of a message to kznt@ag-car.is More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Jan 03 2003 - 00:58:55 EET