Re: Writing AX.25 Server Progie

From: Chuck Gelm (iuvmkpud@rele.tunk.net)
Date: Wed Jan 01 2003 - 19:45:44 EET

  • Next message: Jonathan Naylor: "Linux AX.25 Socket programming"

    Hi, Curt:

     Thanks for your informative response.
    I'll try a 'stable' release of Xastir soon.
    However, I have no idea what CVS is.
    Is CVS are requirement?

    Chuck

    "Curt Mills, WE7U" wrote:
    >
    > On Tue, 31 Dec 2002, Chuck Gelm wrote:
    >
    > > Howdy, Y'all:
    > >
    > > IMHO, from what I can tell after subscribing to the Xastir list
    > > for several weeks, is that
    > > the code is development or prototype rather than
    > > stable.
    >
    > Funny! That's the nature of open-source: It'll constantly be in
    > development because we're constantly improving it, not because it's
    > buggy. With ten developers and 100's of things we want to add,
    > we'll never be done. If we suddenly implemented everything on the
    > feature request list, the users would come up with another 200
    > things they'd want. Overnight!
    >
    > If you saw little development activity, no discussion on the mailing
    > lists, and no new releases coming out of the project, that's when
    > you'd know the project is getting stale and might come to a complete
    > halt. Those are the warning signs of a dying open-source project.
    >
    > The nature of coding though is that when you add new code, you add
    > new bugs. Each new feature requires a few days to fix the new bugs
    > introduced. Typically these are very minor and don't affect much
    > more than the new feature itself. We just went through a period
    > where we were rather active at adding new features, and we're just
    > getting to the end of the debug period.
    >
    > Other things you've probably read about are cases where a new Linux
    > distribution comes out and the distribution is not done correctly.
    > When users try to compile/run Xastir on them, Xastir shows off the
    > problems in the distribution. In this case we can kick
    > SuSE/RedHat/Mandrake/etc in the behind and tell them to fix up their
    > distributions.
    >
    > Try it out and tell us how often Xastir falls over, then try one of
    > the Windows programs and see how long they last. In fact, try
    > both of them hooked up to the full firenet feed for a week (you'll
    > get around 20,000 objects on your screen). Most of the Windows APRS
    > apps will croak, and croak quickly.
    >
    > Xastir "development" versions are much more bug-free than the last
    > "stable" release (from last February). New "development" versions
    > come out about every two weeks. We're about due for another one.
    >
    > Users who don't want to participate in the development will
    > typically run the development releases or the "stable" release if
    > they don't know any better. User's that want to try out all the new
    > features the second they're added run the CVS version and update
    > often (every day works reasonably well). CVS makes this easy/fast
    > to do.
    >
    > That was fun. Where else can I cause trouble now?
    >
    > --
    > Curt Mills, WE7U qngraeez.mngoqnluc@thunderstone.com
    > Senior Methods Engineer/SysAdmin
    > "Lotto: A tax on people who are bad at math!"
    > "Windows: Microsoft's tax on computer illiterates!" -- WE7U
    > "The world DOES revolve around me: I picked the coordinate system!"
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hams" in
    the body of a message to terhi.victor@logonet.com
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed Jan 01 2003 - 20:04:11 EET