From: Tomi Manninen OH2BNS (qfsmoukp.algcpkwwij@ipworks.cz)
Date: Tue Jul 30 2002 - 12:44:23 EEST
On Mon, 29 Jul 2002, Iain Young - G7III wrote:
> Currently (IIRC), the patch routes all IP traffic destined for radio
> links (44/8) down the ipax0 device, and then decides the best layer 2
> (AX25) interface to throw it out.
>
> I _personally_ believe that this is not the way it should be, I don't
> actually like this, but unfortunatley the ipax0 device actually
> encapsulates the IP packet, and puts the AX25 header on etc..
Out of curiosity (and without having any strong personal opinion of my
own) why do you think this not the way to go? I know it breaks ARP but I
suppose that could be corrected somehow.
-- Tomi Manninen Internet: xzkc.xucqwpdov@priceline.com OH2BNS AX.25: terhi.victor@logonet.com KP20ME04 Amprnet: qaqem@rele.tunk.net- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hams" in the body of a message to terhi.victor@logonet.com More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Jul 30 2002 - 12:44:53 EEST