Re: Status of AX.25 in 2.5 / 2.6

From: Jason Flynn G7OCD (gbkiyj@archi.fr)
Date: Tue Jul 30 2002 - 11:14:42 EEST

  • Next message: Jason Flynn G7OCD: "Re: Status of AX.25 in 2.5 / 2.6"

    Tomi Manninen wrote:
    > Yes. That is why you should not have any user services (that are called
    > with plain AX.25) like LinuxNode or a BBS using the same callsign as you
    > have in ifconfig/axports.

      I'm aware fully of the reasons behind this, but when you are running
    a system with 13 AX25 ports you start running out of SSIDs for your
    services. I've had to start naming services with names that aren't
    valid callsigns like 'MARTCONV' and 'SDGBBS' because before long I'm
    going to have used all the SSIDs for ports...
    It's limiting but we just have to put up with it or choose a new
    L2 addressing scheme.

            J

    PS Anyone still not conviced about different L2 callsigns and
    IP addresses needed for each amateur port should think about
    the MACs and IPs on an internet router...
    Then the light should switch on :-)

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hams" in
    the body of a message to klnpus@mail.dy.fi
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Jul 30 2002 - 11:14:01 EEST