Re: Status of AX.25 in 2.5 / 2.6

From: Tomi Manninen OH2BNS (uwupgfr.fjtcevjd@6.udn.pl)
Date: Mon Jul 29 2002 - 15:16:32 EEST

  • Next message: Robert Jenkins: "RE: Status of AX.25 in 2.5 / 2.6"

    On Mon, 29 Jul 2002, Craig Small wrote:

    > If you're looking for something later, you may want to solve the
    > ancient "why does an AX.25 interface need an IP address" question.
    > The answer used to be "because it does", I'm not sure if that is still
    > the case, I've got ports sitting on a Linux computer over *there*
    > (points to rowlf) that don't have IP addresses or have 0.0.0.0

    I think it's still the case. If an interface doesn't have an IP address,
    it won't show up in the "list of known interfaces" from the kernel
    (SIOCGIFCONF I think). So the utils/apps will never find it...

    I did some digging a couple of years ago and also did a patch (with code
    mostly stolen from Matt's/Jens' new-ax.25). See:

     http://hes.iki.fi/archive/dev-hams/2000/0055.html

    I never got an answer.

    Oh, by the way. Has anyone done anything with the NEW-AX.25 patch lately?
    I think it has some potential but unfortunately seems it's now completely
    unmaintained.

    -- 
    Tomi Manninen           Internet:  qhvtt.ahsgyggsew@rigop.com
    OH2BNS                  AX.25:     hrzulr@cfs.sk
    KP20ME04                Amprnet:   pdo.idmq@speed.net.id
    

    - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hams" in the body of a message to qpdbsiv@imsbiz.com More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Jul 29 2002 - 15:20:54 EEST