Re: netrom

From: Richard Adams (bkepkb@mail.dy.fi)
Date: Mon Apr 15 2002 - 22:25:57 EEST

  • Next message: Ricardo Saiz Villoria: "about ax25ipd"

    On Monday 15 April 2002 17:55, Riley Williams wrote:

    > Not if you use IC24 as your IP - they allocate 10.* addresses to your
    > modem and the router at the other end, and their DHCP servers provide
    > a routing line that routes ALL 10.* IP addresses across the modem link
    > to the router you're dialled up to.

    If that provider is using 10.*.*.* numbers across a network then AFAIK that
    is not in accordance with RFC 1918 which states;

      The Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) has reserved the
      following three blocks of the IP address space for private networks:
     
                    10.0.0.0 - 10.255.255.255
                    172.16.0.0 - 172.31.255.255
                    192.168.0.0 - 192.168.255.255

    Now i have little idea where or what this thread started about, however if
    one wants to use 10.0.0.1 for his private network then he/she has "every
    right" to do so, even IF an ISP uses it to do some or other smart tricks with
    period. I wonder if an ISP could even be reprimanded for using an RFC 1918
    address for financial gain, not that it is of concern to me, it is more a
    question of "rules are rules"... After all what else are all RFC;s for period.

    I have not read that RFC rule in full, however reading what i have says to me
    they are "private addresses period".

    Anyway my commentry stops here, this is getting way off topic.

    -- 
    Regards Richard
    terhi.victor@logonet.com
    http://people.zeelandnet.nl/pa3gcu/
    

    - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hams" in the body of a message to cswv.jmrihbhpu@uni-lueneburg.de More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Apr 15 2002 - 22:26:33 EEST