From: Tomi Manninen OH2BNS (niownv.phaq@tkdami.net)
Date: Wed Apr 03 2002 - 17:12:34 EEST
On Wed, 3 Apr 2002, Pär Flitt wrote:
> Personally I'd like to separate the radiomode and it's use, I should
> be able to use whatever mode with whatever protocol I like. I'd like
> to see this as a toolbox where I may for instance use the same
> protocol and switch to a radiomode which suits the current conditions.
> If conditions get bad and MFSK still works but FSK fails with ax.25
> then I'd like to use MFSK with ax.25, when MFSK fails then I'd like to
> use some psk-form if that's any better etc. The link layer model
> should be put to better use.
The requirements for the modulation (in a broad sense meaning the actual
modulation method plus aids for carrier and timing recovery) in packet
based use and stream based use are quite different. For example while you
probably could run AX.25 over MFSK16 with some magic glue, it would be far
from optimal.
-- Tomi Manninen Internet: terhi.victor@logonet.com OH2BNS AX.25: franae.oquxxgo@inphonic.com KP20ME04 Amprnet: chnlol@upf.es- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hams" in the body of a message to cvady@sirimole.unicap.br More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed Apr 03 2002 - 17:13:40 EEST