Re: tokens ?

• Previous message: Chuck nc8q Gelm: "Re: tokens ?: name .vs. value"
• In reply to: Terry Dawson: "Re: tokens ?"
• Next in thread: Terry Dawson: "Re: tokens ?"
• Next in thread: Wilbert Knol: "Re: tokens ?"
• Reply: Terry Dawson: "Re: tokens ?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tuesday 12 March 2002 10:28, Terry Dawson wrote:
> Thomas Sailer wrote:
> > You never could answer that question the way you are suggesting.
> > Only KISS ports were called ax*, other ports, such as SCC cards
> > etc. always had different names.
>
> You're absolutely correct. I concede the point.
>
> On that basis then I guess we ought to look at getting rid of the confusion
> then and settling on using the device name exclusively.

After all the first ethernet card is called eth0 second eth1 etc, plip0, sl0
so why not, ax0 ax1 etc, and scc0 scc1 etc.

>
> Terry

-- 
Regards Richard
terhi.victor@logonet.com
http://people.zeelandnet.nl/pa3gcu/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hams" in
the body of a message to terhi.victor@logonet.com
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

• Next message: Terry Dawson: "Re: tokens ?"
• Previous message: Chuck nc8q Gelm: "Re: tokens ?: name .vs. value"
• In reply to: Terry Dawson: "Re: tokens ?"
• Next in thread: Terry Dawson: "Re: tokens ?"
• Next in thread: Wilbert Knol: "Re: tokens ?"
• Reply: Terry Dawson: "Re: tokens ?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Mar 12 2002 - 18:25:02 EET