Re: tokens ?

From: Craig Small (lwp@rele.tunk.net)
Date: Thu Mar 07 2002 - 01:03:31 EET

  • Next message: Terry Dawson: "Re: tokens ?"

    On Wed, Mar 06, 2002 at 10:19:10PM +1100, Terry Dawson wrote:
    > Chuck nc8q Gelm wrote:
    >
    > >Do the above five Tokens all refer to the same thing?
    >
    > Yes.
    > I've always felt a little uncomfortable about the two-name problem myself.
    >
    > Each AX.25 'port' has associated with it a Linux 'device'. I'd really like
    > to see those become one.

    In ye olde days we only had "butt ugly" names allowed for device names,
    like ax0 pt0a etc. So there was this concept of the "port name" like
    vhf, sydney, 70cm which was an ugly hack and grafted onto the system,
    those names are really a figment of the ax25 libraries and tools
    imagination, they then use the port files to find the ax25 callsign.
    Bit like naming your ethernet "internal" and having some file that
    mapped "internal" to the mac address.

    OK, I think we agree that's pretty yuk.

    Time has moved on and now interfaces can have nice names. My IPv6
    tunnels are called things like trumpet and azure. Makes things a lot
    easier. And no nasty lookup file!

    So perhaps we should re-look at how these tunnels are named and use the
    same thing for the ax25 devices. I'm just not sure if the energy is
    there :/ It would sure clean up the configuration files a lot.

      - Craig

    -- 
    Craig Small VK2XLZ  GnuPG:1C1B D893 1418 2AF4 45EE  95CB C76C E5AC 12CA DFA5
    Eye-Net Consulting http://www.eye-net.com.au/        <mgtuvk@roskapostia.tunk.net>
    MIEEE <dbdcwv.ziayj@kerailya.tunkki.fi>                 Debian developer <qpnqfvrc@mail.dy.fi>
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hams" in
    the body of a message to bcdmchz.kpesripz@uniquefab.com
    More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Mar 07 2002 - 01:04:35 EET