Re: AX25 UTILS and PTC-II

From: Demetre Valaris (izizyyob@nidera.nl)
Date: Sat Jan 19 2002 - 12:28:13 EET

  • Next message: Demetre Valaris: "Re: AX25 UTILS and PTC-II"

    On 18 Jan 2002, at 23:20, Riley Williams wrote:

    > Hi Demetre.
    >
    > > I know that SCS has a firmware that allows you to make your PTC-II a
    > > modem that provides IP over SLIP, but I am not interested in that
    > > since both ends on HF must use the same firmware and hardware and
    > > then again IP over HF is a bit too much to desire!
    >
    > I'm no expert on HF as I'm not licensed for it, but there is one claim
    > in there that is just plain rubbish, and easy to prove as such...
    >
    > > ...both ends on HF must use the same firmware and hardware...
    >
    > ...is demonstratably false even by a complete moron, and no better
    > example of this can be found than AX.25 itself, which works quite
    > happily not only with different firmware but with different brands
    > using different chips to control them. Ethernet in all of its many
    > guises also proves the same fact.
    >
    > The actual requirements are quite simple:
    >
    > 1. The signalling used for the link employs a standard protocol.
    > To take FSK packet as an example, the two ends must employ the
    > same shift between the mark and space frequencies, must shift
    > between them at the same frequency (the Baud rate), must use
    > the same number of bits per character (the Data Length), and
    > must use the same framing format (the Parity and Stop Bits).
    > This corresponds to level 1 (the Physical layer) of the ISO
    > diagram.
    >
    > 2. The packet protocol must be the same for both ends of the link.
    > This corresponds to layers 2 through 7 of the ISO diagram as
    > applicable to the system under discussion.
    >
    > Providing both of these conditions are met, the link is possible.
    > As to whether it is feasible, that depends far more on the details
    > of the various protocols used than on anything in the above.
    >
    > Incidentally, the "same hardware" requirement claimed in your quote is
    > an issue with requirement (1) above, and the "same firmware" requirement is
    > an issue with requirement (2) above, so those are NOT the same thing.
    >
    > Best wishes from Riley.
    >

    Hi Riley,

    Too much talk for nothing. Can you demonstrate a modem other than SCS
    that does IP over HF without having to depend on a computer for the SLIP
    protocol?? I do not think you can because there is none, at least in
    the radio amateur market. So if you need an HF IP point to point link, I am
    afraid that having 2 X SCS PTC-II is the only solution.

    But after all I said clearly in my e-mail that I wasn't interested in that anyway,
    so what is all this fuss about I do not understand.

    Thanks for the e-mail anyway!!!

    73 de Demetre SV1UY
    e-mail tugha.hngmwbasa@rele.tunk.net
    http://www.athnet.ampr.org/~sv1uy
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hams" in
    the body of a message to ibgelrcb@vesuvius.com
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Jan 19 2002 - 13:24:21 EET