From: John Ackermann N8UR (uqdkmhxp.lrmx@lapl.org)
Date: Fri Nov 16 2001 - 21:42:45 EET
--On Friday, November 16, 2001 8:25 PM +0100 Sandor Dibuz
<hfaq.ywid@schering.de> wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Nov 2001, John Ackermann N8UR wrote:
>
>> Just a quick followup re the status of the TAPR radio project ...
>
> Not meant to be offending in any way, but does it still have a sense to
> design and build such a radio? 2.4Gigs FHSS cards are available second
> hand for less than 30 bux.
>
>
> 73... Sanyi
Good question. The idea behind the TAPR radio is a bit different than the
802.11b stuff. First, although the original design is for an RF board at
900 MHz that is compatible with US "Part 15" unlicensed operation, there's
no reason a different RF board couldn't be designed to operate on other ham
bands with higher power. So it's a potentially more flexible design.
Second, and more important, the RF performance of this radio is way beyond
that of PCM cards that are intended for use in a LAN. The front end is
designed to be very robust, and the modulation scheme includes forward
error correction and other tricks. The design goal is 128kbps+ throughput
after FEC over a roughly 30 mile line-of-sight path. If the path is clean
enough to allow the FEC to be turned down, the throughput can be quite a
bit higher (the raw bit rate is 768kbps).
Finally, the networking protocol is designed with radio "stacking" and
point-to-multipoint operations in mind, so it can serve as the basis for a
metro-area LAN as well as point-to-point operation.
This radio won't replace your 802.11b card, but will make metro area
networks and longer-haul point-to-point links possible, or at least much
easier.
73,
John
---- John Ackermann N8UR ganfjpy@unipr.it http://www.febo.com President, TAPR afstweyt.thqevs@sapuri.co.jp http://www.tapr.org- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hams" in the body of a message to okcuft@gis.net More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Nov 16 2001 - 21:52:34 EET