Re: pciscc and 2.4.x

From: Hamish Moffatt (vudd.zfuzvajbn@dcs.net)
Date: Tue Nov 06 2001 - 23:25:03 EET

Next message: Klaus Kudielka: "Re: pciscc and 2.4.x"

Previous message: Hamish Moffatt: "Re: Sattrack 3.1.6"
In reply to: Richard Adams: "Re: pciscc and 2.4.x"
Next in thread: Klaus Kudielka: "Re: pciscc and 2.4.x"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, Nov 06, 2001 at 08:56:28PM +0000, Richard Adams wrote:
> Life is TOO short for 1200 baud period. Get a life, get a modem that can do
> at "least" 64k+. In all intensive perposes thats too slow as well for many
> people these days.

1200 is fine for telemetry uses (eg APRS).

Hamish

-- 
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <zbirbirz@mail.dy.fi> <lwzq.dmlydwtshc@asisna.com>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hams" in
the body of a message to vazwuuco@satwave.net
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Next message: Klaus Kudielka: "Re: pciscc and 2.4.x"
Previous message: Hamish Moffatt: "Re: Sattrack 3.1.6"
In reply to: Richard Adams: "Re: pciscc and 2.4.x"
Next in thread: Klaus Kudielka: "Re: pciscc and 2.4.x"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Nov 06 2001 - 23:25:50 EET