Re: Netrom & linuxnode qstn..

From: Tomi Manninen OH2BNS (terhi.victor@logonet.com)
Date: Thu Sep 27 2001 - 08:43:05 EEST

  • Next message: g3orh: "xfbb setup / operation ?"

    On Wed, 26 Sep 2001, pa3gcu wrote:

    > On Monday 24 September 2001 23:23, Tomi Manninen wrote:
    >
    > > But the problem was about routing broadcasts. Sending routing info as
    > > unicasts directed to one station seems to be one of the numerous
    > > non-documented extensions to the protocol. Fortunately it's pretty
    > > simple to extend Linux netromd so it will accept such broadcasts as well.
    > > Apparently I have done some of the work already as Arno told us. Thanks
    > > Arno, I had completely forgotten about that. :)
    >
    > Ok agreed, on most points, but if those broadcasts are undesirable like i
    > find them, then i for one would like to see a rejection mechanisum to exclude
    > them.

    Could you explain why these are undesired to you? Remember I was talking
    about fully compliant NET/ROM routing broadcasts sent to a unicast
    address. Nothing fishy, except that the destination address is not NODES
    but your own NETROM callsign.

    > Something like reject a mnemonic that contains an asterisk, i remember
    > way back when Jonathan first started writing netrom into the kernel i sent
    > him a patch which excluded asterisks, or at least tryed to, that same patch
    > inclded upper and lower case letters, (contrary i beleve to RFC) which he did
    > include. This problem seems to be becoming more of a problem thesedays, or am
    > i getting older and too grumpy.?

    Nodes with asterisk in the mnemonic field are never propagated in routing
    broadcasts. Also that asterisk is not really the mnemonic. It's just
    something the kernel shows when then mnemonic field is _empty_. Anyway
    those routes also have quality=0 so they are _not_propagated_.

    If you ever see (with listen -a) a NET/ROM routing broadcast with a "*" in
    in then that is 100% a bug and you should report it right away (with
    details). However I'm pretty sure you won't see that.

    If, on the other hand, you see a broadcast with an empty mnemonic field
    then that is something I'd like to know more about. I don't think this is
    possible either however.

    -- 
    Tomi Manninen           Internet:  bgntick@orbis.de
    OH2BNS                  AX.25:     terhi.victor@logonet.com
    KP20ME04                Amprnet:   wsi.ttvwx@globaldialog.com
    

    - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hams" in the body of a message to terhi.victor@logonet.com More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Sep 27 2001 - 08:49:12 EEST