Re: compressed through 'node'

From: Tomi Manninen (lgprajk@kollmorgen.com)
Date: Sun Jul 15 2001 - 03:00:27 EEST

Next message: Tomi Manninen: "Re: compressed through 'node'"

Previous message: Richard Adams: "Re: Linpac - yet another problem"
In reply to: g3orh: "Re: compressed through 'node'"
Next in thread: jabennett: "Re: compressed through 'node'"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, 6 Jul 2001, g3orh wrote:

> However , one could also set specific extra rights to specific callsigns I
> assume instead of making it general. I would agree with you that it would
> seem reasonable to include into Node-0.3.0.* a function which avoids this
> distinction being necessary / per callsign or /per mode such that compressed
> mail will *always* pass no matter what. Anyone using 'node' is bound to come
> across this problem.

The escape mechanism can be disabled for everyone in node.conf. See "man
node.conf".

-- Tomi Manninen Internet: wudxsi@rele.tunk.net OH2BNS AX.25: terhi.victor@logonet.com KP20ME04 Amprnet: urtfqeyb@relay.tunkki.fi

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hams" in the body of a message to gvyxla@runnet.ru

Next message: Tomi Manninen: "Re: compressed through 'node'"
Previous message: Richard Adams: "Re: Linpac - yet another problem"
In reply to: g3orh: "Re: compressed through 'node'"
Next in thread: jabennett: "Re: compressed through 'node'"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sun Jul 15 2001 - 03:02:14 EEST