Re: compressed through 'node'

From: g3orh (efnwbrc@telegate.no)
Date: Fri Jul 06 2001 - 09:06:45 EEST

  • Next message: Ian Russon: "linuxnode"

    Hi Roger,

                        Well as you may have gathered I am no expert so I join
    with you in saying "over to the experts".

    However , one could also set specific extra rights to specific callsigns I
    assume instead of making it general. I would agree with you that it would
    seem reasonable to include into Node-0.3.0.* a function which avoids this
    distinction being necessary / per callsign or /per mode such that compressed
    mail will *always* pass no matter what. Anyone using 'node' is bound to come
    across this problem.
    - Regards Colin (73's)
    - vswytt.lrdtvwahw@eldosales.com
    ----- Original Message -----

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hams" in
    the body of a message to qtvlfj.kdqypnwps@flets-a-west-15-157.dsn.jp



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Jul 06 2001 - 10:36:45 EEST