From: g3orh (desz@nhbragg.com)
Date: Thu Jul 05 2001 - 18:20:22 EEST
With apologies for the inclusion of both traffics (and a carbon to Ian
Russon) this is a copy of my enquiry to ian on the topic I saw him
commenting on regarding pushing compressed mail through node 0.3.0. It seems
to fit the bill (but there must be a better way surely). I am dubious myself
about setting permissions high for everyone.
> > I am alarmed at the reference to running compressed mail
> > through linuxnode as when I go live with linuxnode I will (presumeably)
> > have the same problem ? Can you tell me what this was all about please ?
----- Original Message -----
From: Ian Russon <ehpgsxh@onb.ac.at>
To: <terhi.victor@logonet.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 11:09 AM
Subject: Re: winpac/compressed
> Hi colin
> yep matey no prob i will try to explain it hihi
> but i am not very good at explainning thinks
> right here goes
>
> the linuxnode does not allow control char's though it y default
> which in turn stuffs up all compressed forwarding
> the answer is to add 287 to the node.perms files to any person
> who will be forwarding though it or even add it as default ???
> eg :-
> * ax25 * * 383
> * netrom * * 383
> * local * * 383
> * ampr * * 383
> * inet * * 383
> * host * * 383
>
> this will allow any one to forward though the node and other bits
> all explained in the 'man pages'
>
> hope this helps colin
>
> ian
>
> p.s.
> sent the reply via the net its quicker it took 3 days to get
> here otherwise
> anymore help just ask
>
>
> cheers and beers
>
>
> ian
> <cut>
Regards Colin (73's)
vnfp.kopdxezs@fastnet.ne.jp
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hams" in
the body of a message to mnvv.erstm@rele.tunk.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Jul 05 2001 - 19:21:47 EEST