From: Richard Adams (lbcztg@frognet.net)
Date: Wed May 23 2001 - 19:32:39 EEST
On Wed, 23 May 2001, Craig Small wrote:
> On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 07:26:45PM +0100, Jorge Matias wrote:
> > Kissnetd it's not neccessary.
> >
> > I can use the following
> >
> > kissattach /dev/pty<x> <port A> <IP address of A>
> > kissattach /dev/tty<x> <port B> <IP address of B>
> >
> > where 'x' is sequence of a caracter followed by a digit (e.g. a1).
> >
> > It's enough to make some tests any modem or TNC.
> >
> I thought there was a problem doing that, something to do with the sad
> pty code in Linux. Though that WAS a long time ago the issue first came
> up.
I dont know why the above needs to be used but the pty/tty pair seems strange
to me, you get 2 ax[X] interfaces not one.
Like the baker said, there are more ways to bake a cake than one thinks. ;-)
> - Craig
> --
> Craig Small VK2XLZ GnuPG:1C1B D893 1418 2AF4 45EE 95CB C76C E5AC 12CA DFA5
> Eye-Net Consulting http://www.eye-net.com.au/ <nmpfzwrm@imc2.com>
> MIEEE <vkx.gabdrgx@c-com.com.tw> Debian developer <pkkuzjcc.qaojcud@pomona.edu>
-- Regards Richard xvxdirjm.uwsrg@roskapostia.tunk.net http://people.zeelandnet.nl/pa3gcu/- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hams" in the body of a message to eoramfu@u.mnie.pl
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed May 23 2001 - 19:40:22 EEST