From: Erik Mouw (tmqs@stenaline.com)
Date: Tue May 22 2001 - 15:39:38 EEST
On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 06:51:57AM -0500, Brent D. Norris wrote:
> > I veto, the whole point of moving to ECN was to make a statement and
> > get people to fix their kit.
> >
> Isn't this a problem though because the messge saying that ECN was enabled
> was set after ECN was enabled? Thus these people have no idea what is
> going on and they probably won't know what to fix until they do.
Not really, Dave Miller warned in advance that vger would enable ECN
Real Soon Now [tm]. If that wasn't a trigger for people to test if
their stuff could handle ECN, what does?
Erik
-- J.A.K. (Erik) Mouw, Information and Communication Theory Group, Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Information Technology and Systems, Delft University of Technology, PO BOX 5031, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands Phone: +31-15-2783635 Fax: +31-15-2781843 Email: ost.xrko@iaspire.net WWW: http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hams" in the body of a message to terhi.victor@logonet.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue May 22 2001 - 15:41:20 EEST