Re: Questions re pseudo-ports

From: Bill Vodall (ngx.swhyecjn@ontariopowergeneration.com)
Date: Sat Dec 09 2000 - 17:40:01 EET

  • Next message: Hans Grobler: "mkiss.c-2.4.0-test12-pre7-patch-v1"

    > I would prefer not to make aprsd do repeating between ports as well.
    > I think you should run digi_ned or aprsdigi on the same machine to do
    > that (which is no problem, since both will share the AX.25 stack).
    > aprsd then would send everything from all RF ports on to IP, and
    > send IP messages onto the appropriate RF port.
    >
    > Actually, working out which is the appropriate RF port might not
    > be too hard; aprsd already remembers who it has heard so that it
    > doesn't send out messages to stations it hasn't heard on RF.
    > It would just have to be extended to track that on a per-port
    > basis.
    >
    > Does this sound sufficient?

    That would be 90% of the project. Multiport aprsd would be the
    tool we need to move to local LAN's and save some bandwidth on
    the grossly abused 144.39 channel.

    Running Digi_ned at the same time would allow control of
    digi'ing between the ports.

    Bill - WA7NWP

    __________________________________________________
    Do You Yahoo!?
    Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products.
    http://shopping.yahoo.com/
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hams" in
    the body of a message to gysvur.mjvfxf@cm189-35.liwest.at



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Dec 09 2000 - 17:40:47 EET