Re: netromd & ax25d

From: Erik Jakobsen (pwshfctc.adecwyn@orangecaibe.com)
Date: Mon Oct 02 2000 - 09:38:37 EEST

  • Next message: Hans-Peter Zorn: "Re: netromd & ax25d"

    Richard Adams wrote:
    >
    > On Sun, 01 Oct 2000, Erik Jakobsen wrote about , Re: netromd & ax25d:
    >
    > > > > I have difficulties reading riddles.
    > > >
    > > > I think Tomi TOLD you your problem in his first reply, which i thought to
    > > > be rather curtious, you need to assign your ports an IP#.
    > >
    > > Ok thanks Richard. I also could se that, but what I could not see was
    > > how to do it.
    > >
    > > And I still cannot se how to do it.
    > >
    > > But maybe it IS difficult to tell.
    >
    > It is VERY simple;

    Ok sound very nice.

    > One cannot give a direct answer because we dont know what sort of hardware
    > you have, however TNC's attached with kissattach should be used as follows.

    Ok then I will give it here:

    I run an xfbb7.02g fbb mailbox here. I use the SCS PTC-II, and it runs
    on /dev/ttyS0.
    All the HF, U/VHF (with 2 1200/2400) modems and the HF scanning runs on
    this. All
    in one is just using the ttyS0 port.
     
    > kissattach -l -m 256 /dev/ttyS0 uhf oz4kk-1

    Ok thanks for this Richard. Very nice to know how to do.

    BUT isn't there a BUT here ??. The kissattach require a tnc in
    kiss-mode. My PTC-II
    with its 3 modems is setup as an extended WA8DED hostmode.

    Then I cannot use the kissattach, but nevertheless is there a solution
    ??.
     
    > SCC cards soundcards and the like's

    I have also an SCC card, but its into my old fbbdos computer, but I have
    had the idea
    to put it in the linux box too.
     
    > ifconfig uhf 44.xx.xx.xx hw ax25 oz4kk-1

    Oh is this the solution for my PTC-II ??.

     
    > >
    > > Then I will excuse that I have rised the question.
    > >
    > > But the answers could have been more right out of the road. For instance
    > > 'sorry I can't
    > > help you'. That would have been ok instaed of maybe ' I do not know to
    > > answer your question',
    >
    > The questions was answered in "general" because your hardware was unknown
    > and a direct answer was NOT possable.

    Ok.
    > >
    > > But whay waiste so much writing to tell me that ?.
    >
    > If you had sent a more explanative question a lot of bandwidth would have
    > been saved.

    Ok fine, and to you Tomi IF you read this SORRY for my beahaviour.

    And thanks to you Richard, and I look forward to your reply.
     
    > --
    > Regards Richard
    > qxyix@fredolsen.no
    > http://people.zeelandnet.nl/pa3gcu/

    -- 
    De bedste hilsener // Best regards // Erik Jakobsen
    terhi.victor@logonet.com // SuSE linux 6.3
    Licensed RadioAmateur with the callsign OZ4KK.
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hams" in
    the body of a message to svn.iqwckjb@smc.edu
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 02 2000 - 09:56:28 EEST