Re: Don't you just hate BADLY configured auto responders !!!

From: Geoff Blake (xuraq@swietochlowice.org)
Date: Mon Aug 07 2000 - 22:15:28 EEST

Next message: Leif Mattsson: "Re: smdiag"

Previous message: Juan Carlos Carreras: "RE: smdiag"
In reply to: Stewart Wilkinson: "Don't you just hate BADLY configured auto responders !!!"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, 7 Aug 2000, Stewart Wilkinson wrote:

> Anyone else getting fed up of seeing these reponses (I'm getting 99% of
> them before I actually see the Message that caused the auto-response) ??

Err, yes. But I suggest "he who is without sin cast the first stone" - or
leave it up to the list manager to have a quiet word on Raymond's return.

Geoff

-- 
      Geoff Blake        geoff @ palaemon . co . uk	     linux 2.0.36
      Chelmsford         g8gnz @ g8gnz . ampr . org          sparc - i586
      Intel create faster processors - Microsoft create slower processes
        The product of a MicroSoft free zone - without a single reboot
               signature and content copyright Geoff Blake 2000

Next message: Leif Mattsson: "Re: smdiag"
Previous message: Juan Carlos Carreras: "RE: smdiag"
In reply to: Stewart Wilkinson: "Don't you just hate BADLY configured auto responders !!!"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Aug 08 2000 - 07:43:51 EEST