From: Wilbert Knol (xhm.qtfdsbv@skynet.ca)
Date: Mon May 03 1300 - 17:23:42 HMT
Gerard, F6FGZ, wrote:
> At this point of the debate, one can see we have two kinds of logging
> software:
> (1) One for DXer, ragchewer or casual ops.
> (2) One for contesters ops, competitor or casual.
There is a good chance a DXer would also be a casual contester, wanting to
use their normal logging software to 'hand out points' on a Sunday afternoon.
The casual contester probably also belongs in category (1).
In my view, building competitive (bells & whistles) contest software is
unrealistic for several reasons.
But adding the basic CW features mentioned previously would make it useful
to category 1 CW ops.
Even if not implemented, it would be good to have a modular approach
allowing those features to be added later on.
I am going to have a look at the logging s/ware listed by Hans-Peter (tnx).
Wilbert, ZL2BSJ
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 03 2000 - 08:26:12 EEST