From: Gerd (terhi.victor@logonet.com)
Date: Wed Feb 02 2000 - 11:53:05 EET
Hello Hamish, hello all,
> On Tue, Feb 01, 2000 at 03:53:58PM +0100, Gerd wrote:
> > There are some good reasons to still use something like BayCom in our days.
> > The first reason is: There are still frequencies that one cannot operate
> > more than 1200 bps on, due to bandwidth limitations, for example.
>
> soundmodem supports 1200 AFSK just fine. I use it at home.
Yes, I believe that once you found out the right settings it will work not
worse than a BayCom. But until you are at this stage, it is a very long and
stony way to go....
> > The fourth reason is that the (few) soundcard designs supposed to work with
> > SoundModem are not available any more. That is because ISA cards are
> > generally
>
> Yes this a real problem. Somebody needs to work on it; it's open source,
> so it doesn't have to be Tom. Ideally, it would work with the
> standard sound drivers (either OSS or ALSA).
According to Thomas Sailer, there is a problem of those drivers not being
capable of switching from playback to record/sample mode fast enough.
It may also be not very easy to get FSK RX/TX filters as well as other signal
processing "goodies" working with them.
At least those were the reasons for Thomas Sailer why he decided to write a
separate SoundModem driver.
Cheers
Gerd
-- Gerd Roethig Universität Leipzig, Medizinische Klinik u. PK I Johannisallee 32, 04103 Leipzig Tel. (0341) 97 12622, Fax (0341) 97 12515
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Feb 02 2000 - 12:00:47 EET