From: Greg Blakely (etqqoni@datasiel.net)
Date: Wed Jan 05 2000 - 16:46:02 EET
You may want to look at what they're doing at the Linux Router Project.
It sounds like it has much of what you want.
73, Greg
kb0tdf
> -----Original Message-----
> From: tkwm.neowd@mail.dy.fi
> [mailto:twr.nltsnwphdu@ccproofs.com]On Behalf Of Niall Parker
> Sent: Friday, July 10, 2893 17:44
> To: vooqil@net.gy
> Subject: Re: Linux Y2K problems ! => small linux ?
>
>
> [snip]
> > > - Motherboard : ABIT PD5N Pentium-166(IBM)
> > > - Linux Redhat 4.2 with 2.0.35 kernel
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > I don't believe that this is Y2K compliant... Considering that you
> > are two major releases and a couple of years out of date, I'm
> not surprised
> > if you got burned.
> >
> [snip]
> > Try upgrading to something more recent.
> >
> > > 73
> > > Cees Tool - PA3AES
> >
> > Mike
> > --
> > Michael H. Warfield | (770) 985-6132 | cvvl.lskfpuer@univie.ac.at
> > (The Mad Wizard) | (770) 331-2437 |
> http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/
> > NIC whois: MHW9 | An optimist believes we live in the
> best of all
> > PGP Key: 0xDF1DD471 | possible worlds. A pessimist is sure of it!
>
> ... on a marginally related question ...
>
> Once upon a time, I could get a fair bit of functionality onto a single
> single floppy, making it practical to build radio
> routers/terminals without
> harddrives and minimal (< 8MB) RAM. When I looked at updating the
> cramdisks
> I've been using, I was stumped by the considerable increase in the size of
> the kernel generally and libc in particular ... going from an older libc5
> to glibc seems to need 5-6 times the memory !
>
> Any ideas on getting the current kernels and utils down in size ?
>
> ... Niall
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 05 2000 - 16:55:33 EET