Re: Linux Y2K problems ! => small linux ?

From: Niall Parker (vlkjx.rpfx@lyskopi.no)
Date: Tue Jan 05 100 - 06:08:36 HMT

  • Next message: Wilbert Knol: "Re: Xforms tools, where?"

     [snip]
    > > - Motherboard : ABIT PD5N Pentium-166(IBM)
    > > - Linux Redhat 4.2 with 2.0.35 kernel
    > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    > I don't believe that this is Y2K compliant... Considering that you
    > are two major releases and a couple of years out of date, I'm not surprised
    > if you got burned.
    >
     [snip]
    > Try upgrading to something more recent.
    >
    > > 73
    > > Cees Tool - PA3AES
    >
    > Mike
    > --
    > Michael H. Warfield | (770) 985-6132 | cguxx@oreck.com
    > (The Mad Wizard) | (770) 331-2437 | http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/
    > NIC whois: MHW9 | An optimist believes we live in the best of all
    > PGP Key: 0xDF1DD471 | possible worlds. A pessimist is sure of it!

    ... on a marginally related question ...

    Once upon a time, I could get a fair bit of functionality onto a single
    single floppy, making it practical to build radio routers/terminals without
    harddrives and minimal (< 8MB) RAM. When I looked at updating the cramdisks
    I've been using, I was stumped by the considerable increase in the size of
    the kernel generally and libc in particular ... going from an older libc5
    to glibc seems to need 5-6 times the memory !

    Any ideas on getting the current kernels and utils down in size ?

                                                            ... Niall



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 05 2000 - 06:43:02 EET