Re: no more ipc channels

From: Tomi Manninen OH2BNS (cwovmzb.lhayamtg@mail.dy.fi)
Date: Tue Jan 04 2000 - 08:54:12 EET

Next message: Hamish Moffatt: "Re: new sattrack packages"

Previous message: Yves ESVAN: "pb-pg and libax25 and PFHadd and antenna tacking"
In reply to: Kjell Jarl: "Re: no more ipc channels"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, 3 Jan 2000, Kjell Jarl wrote:

> Thanks Tomi, yes kill -9 my.script has been performed regularly. Seems
> to be a bad habit of mine, have to change it. Also, I may be doing wrong
> in the expect script, node simply is left in the dark?

Well sending SIGKILL to terminate node certainly doesn't give it any
chance to free the IPC message channel. Besides using SIGKILL should
always be the absolute last resort when trying to make a process
terminate.

If you can't get node to exit cleanly you can send a SIGTERM or a SIGQUIT
to it.

-- 
--- Tomi Manninen / gaea.pvuhmdk@kadiri.com / OH2BNS @ OH2RBI.FIN.EU ---

Next message: Hamish Moffatt: "Re: new sattrack packages"
Previous message: Yves ESVAN: "pb-pg and libax25 and PFHadd and antenna tacking"
In reply to: Kjell Jarl: "Re: no more ipc channels"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 04 2000 - 08:56:28 EET