> Avoid 220MHz as this is not available round the world. There is
> probably more digital radio work going on in Europe than the USA
> so make sure its possible to 'translate' to those most likely to
> be interested!! 430Mhz is better for internationalism even with
> the shorter range it at least is not lacking bandwidth (but
> 1290MHz would be even better on that score and you benefit from
> cellphone technology at those frequencies)
For those wishing to check the precice bandplans in the UK, together
with any other licensing condition, this link...
Q> http://www.radio.gov.uk/document/ra_info/br68.htm
...provides all the current details. If any prospective PC radio
design complies with it, it will probably be snapped up quite quickly.
Best wishes from Riley.
PS: The kernel versions page is now back online at the URL below, and
includes separate sublists both for each kernel series, and for
each year of development.
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| There is something frustrating about the quality and speed of Linux |
| development, ie., the quality is too high and the speed is too high, |
| in other words, I can implement this XXXX feature, but I bet someone |
| else has already done so and is just about to release their patch. |
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
* http://www.memalpha.cx/Linux/Kernel/