Linux-Hams archive - November 1999: Re: axdigi vs. other methods?

Re: axdigi vs. other methods?

Jose A. Amador (fktxr@fsnm.co.uk)
Thu, 4 Nov 1999 10:39:55 UTC0


I wonder, for "selective" digipeating, doesn't rxecho solve this
problem ? In its config file you can specify what you want
(etc/ax25/rxecho.conf), if you need to be selective. I used it for a
time to connect JNOS kiss ports to the kernel ax25 support. Now I
use net2kiss, and I find it neater for my purposes, but rxecho did a
good job.

Jose, CO2JA

On 4 Nov 99 at 8:34, John Ackermann wrote:

> I also use axdigi and it works well. But it needs one change -- it's
> an all-or-nothing tool in that when it's running, it allows wide-open
> digipeating from any port on the system to any other port. I've had a
> few lusers do Very Bad Things to our network when they discovered, for
> example, that they could digi from the slow 1200 baud port to the 19.2kb
> port. We need a little config file that specifies allowable input to
> output mappings.
>
> Having said that, I *don't* commit to do the mods (though I might give it
> a try in my spare time).
>
> John N8UR
> jyzzvywt.tdhrvud@onthenet.com.au
> ----
> In message <002601bf2695$785ce640$xpsn@lailanet.fi>, "Phil Maley" writes:
> >Hi Chris
> >
> >I am using axdigi on a gateway system to digipeat between the RF
> >ports and the axip wormhole port. It works very well. I guess it
> >was a philosophical decision to remove a "user space" application
> >from the kernel even though to me as a user it would seem to fall
> >in the same category as kernel ip forwarding. I don't know of any
> >alternatives to axdigi.
> >
> >73
> >Phil VK6AD
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: sqzoy.esqeqgil@crocker.net
> >> [mailto:vdwvyf.mbxi@aasgroup.com]On Behalf Of Chris Ruffin
> >> Sent: Thursday, 4 November 1999 13:50
> >> To: rhdobo@mx.dy.fi
> >> Subject: axdigi vs. other methods?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> What is the best way to handle digipeating with linux? I've
> >> looked at the linux-hams archive and it seems that there used to
> >> be support for this in the kernel, but then there is axdigi,
> >> which I find odd not to be in a debian package. I figure that
> >> there would be axdigi in a package somewhere if there wasn't
> >> kernel support for it. In fact, I saw on the archive where it
> >> had been "taken out," which I don't particularly understand.
> >>
> >> So, before I install axdigi (I hate installing non-packagized
> >> software)- is there another way to do this with the kernel?
> >>
> >> Chris
> >> --
> >> Chris Ruffin <lcdfiw@grupomas.com>
> >> http://www.ece.msstate.edu/~ruff/