Linux-Hams archive - April 1999: Re: Compiling the Kernel -- Again

Re: Compiling the Kernel -- Again

Karl F. Larsen (szni@gvt.net.br)
Sun, 4 Apr 1999 12:27:29 -0600 (MDT)


On Sun, 4 Apr 1999, Mike Bilow wrote:

}
}
} Mike Werner wrote in a message to Mike Bilow:
}
} MW> Karl: Reread the error message he sent (relevant section
} MW> pointed out below) - it is *not* a kernel source problem.
} MW> He is missing as86 - that is not part of the kernel source.
} MW> It is an assembler program, and as such would be part of a
} MW> different package. In Debian it's in the bin86 package, in
} MW> Slackware it's in the binutils package in diskset d1. I
} MW> don't know where Red Hat puts it, but I'd imagine it'll be
} MW> in the vincinity of gcc and the like. I understand you want
} MW> to help, but at least *read* the error messages people send.
}
} Your diagnosis is correct, and I believe the 16-bit assembler "as86" is in what
} both Red Hat and Debian call the "bin86" package. Ironically, this same
} dependency error also affects Debian, and I own the bug (35449) on it.
}
} The solution is to manually install the "bin86" package.

Just a minute. I have never manually installed any bin86 and I
have compiled kernels that have all the ax25-utils set and I get a clean
compile. I am using Red Hat version 5.2 and the *real* kernel tree, not
the one Red Hat sends with it.

Why do I not get the errors?

}
} -- Mike
}
}
}

Best wishes

- Karl F. Larsen, knpnxkmy.pmoilnhz@stnet.com.br (505) 524-3303 -