Linux-Hams archive - January 1998: Re: 2.0.33 with ax25-module-14e

Re: 2.0.33 with ax25-module-14e

Brent Corbin (ptmp@miraclelinux.com)
Tue, 6 Jan 1998 10:06:42 -0800

Actually, I think the claim was that patch-2.2 worked fine for
at least one person, implying that the other versions of patch
might be broken... Of course, given a plausible reason for the
.rej (thanks!), I'd be a bit more suspicious of patch-2.2 8*)

Thanks again...

On Tue, Jan 06, 1998 at 11:35:55AM +0000, Richard Adams wrote:
> So its seems not to be patch-2.2 causing the problem reported by someone
> else.
>