Linux-Hams archive - May 1997: Re: Unreachable code Protocol ?

Re: Unreachable code Protocol ?

dg1ees (yggp.nbmrumukn@oldworldind.com)
Sun, 11 May 1997 20:08:58 +0200 (MET DST)


G'day,

On Tue, 6 May 1997 ysl.gukvkimkl@kentline-tropical.com wrote:

> Then your system is saying IP over IP (protocol ID 4/94) what are you going
> on about, I don't know anything about this.
METO ;) I'm not the expert...

> It's not a routing problem, it is a protocol problem. Either you have to
> tell DB0QS-9 to route 192.18.12.1 directly or you have to masquerade
> 192.18.12.1 when it comes out the radio port or change the 192 number to a
> 44 number or you have to run some IP tunneling code.
Hmmmm, i guess i have to set up an ipip tunnel. Never done that..
>
> > What does Protocol unreachable mean ? And what can i do to control the tnc
> > with kernel-ax25 and tnos runs via pseudolink with 192# ?
> pseudolink? You mean you've made this 192 number up? Then you should be
> using 192.168 something. But we have lots of 44 numbers, why not make
> everything a 44 number?
I would like to but I've only one single 44#. There are not much left for
44.130.18.xxx. I asked our local ip-coordinator for a second. His answer
was :"No way!" But he also said that i could use that 192-trick.

Anyways, i'm running ax25-utils-2.1.37 only now. No more Tnos in use here.
The only thing i needed Tnos for was that NNTP-Client. I've gotten
slrnpull working with the WNOS NNTP-Server now.

Thanks to all who've responded! Vy 73 de

--
Stephan Goldenberg		:	pdd@addpro.se
  --  DG1EES  --	amprnet	:	ydtij@noanet.net
  Essen, Germany	51°N 28,040'	6°E 56,479'	[JO31LL]