Linux-Hams archive - May 1997: [Fwd: Re: amprnet interest fading?]

[Fwd: Re: amprnet interest fading?]

Tim Connolly (terhi.victor@logonet.com)
Fri, 09 May 1997 12:54:12 +0000

Received: by gw.kb8eht.ampr.org (JNOS1.11x6) with POP3
id AA21289 ; Thu, 08 May 1997 21:49:24 utc
Received: from falcon.tamucc.edu (falcon.tamucc.edu [165.95.7.1]) by access.mountain.net (8.8.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id WAA24266 for <zsvx@am1st.com>; Thu, 8 May 1997 22:48:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by falcon.tamucc.edu; id AA22001; Thu, 8 May 1997 21:48:25 -0500
Date: Thu, 8 May 1997 21:48:25 -0500
X-Sender: ktioqf.infwzqp@inet-th.net
Message-Id: <v0153050aaf97fa5b1de3@[165.95.2.97]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: Tim Connolly <agonsjg@danielsagency.com>
From: pnskdsnn.nvyq@rele.tunk.net (Edward R. Jones)
Subject: Re: amprnet interest fading?

> Nope, I heard a friend try to explain spread spectum... He didn't do a
>very good job. 73's - Tim

Roger, it's really vague to me also. I'd like to learn more. From what
I've been told, sounds like it offers the hope of higher speeds with lower
error rates.

Take care & 73 de Ed (ab5eh)