Linux-Hams archive - May 1997: [Fwd: Re: amprnet interest fading?]

[Fwd: Re: amprnet interest fading?]

Tim Connolly (ucyxjawf@cesca.es)
Fri, 09 May 1997 00:28:34 +0000


Message-ID: <terhi.victor@logonet.com>
Date: Fri, 09 May 1997 00:27:26 +0000
From: Tim Connolly <terhi.victor@logonet.com>
Organization: Vienna Computer Services
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01 (X11; I; Linux 2.0.27 i586)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Edward R. Jones" <dggcwo.bbjbarcidq@psusd.us>
Subject: Re: amprnet interest fading?
References: <v01530506af97c0e59dbb@[165.95.2.97]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Edward R. Jones wrote:
>
> >> It's probably just a matter of time (a short time) before the only ones on
> >> amprnet are the sysops and other people with an interest in this type of
> >> networking.
> >>
> >> Other comments?
> >
> >Without a significant increase in available speeds over the radio for the
> >same price (9600 is now considered very slow, and on the ham bands it's
> >still the fast transfer) your may be right with your prediction.
> >
> >--
> >/-------------------+--------+-------------------+-------------------------\
> >I Andrzej K. Brandt I SP5WCA I wbt.vlmvjnad@mail.dy.fi I tsrsr.ilwueyra@tbpenick.com I
> >+-------------------+--------+-----+-------------+-------------------------+
> >| http://melkor.mimuw.edu.pl/~andy | IRC: Emin | PGP key available |
> >\--------------------------------------------------------------------------/
>
> Andrzej, you bring up another good point - radio speeds - or the lack
> thereof. At the university, there are some commercial packet links (for
> remote sensing) running at much higher speeds than our 19.2 kbaud amateur
> links. I've also heard that some folks in Tucson are experimenting with
> spread spectrum links offering much higher speeds. Now I see, in our local
> computer store, someone is selling a small, somewhat portable, satellite
> dish that advertises isdn speeds via satellite.
>
> Are there any kits or plans we might use to build something faster? It
> would be fun to try somethings, even on a small scale. Another opinion, for
> what it's worth, is that I suspect most amprnet people are experimenters.
> Who else would have the patience to tinker with xnos, linux, kiss, etc.,
> ;-)
>
> 73 de Ed (ab5eh)

Just curious... I am by far inexperienced in Amateur Satellite service.
However, would it be correct in saying that you could pass a wide signal
(like 25 KHz or better) thru a sattelite ? Wouldn't this be neat for
38400 packet operations. I saw some kits at this address:

http://www.g8stw.demon.co.uk/data/vfast288.html

Any ideas??

I'm still toying with the 10 Mbps @ 10 GHz (or 24 GHz) idea. Have yet to
find anyone over 2 Mbps.