Linux-Hams archive - March 1997: Re: rose UNSPEC

Re: rose UNSPEC

Terry Dawson (tzq.zrjyd@stat.salzburg-online.at)
Mon, 10 Mar 1997 08:28:37 +1100

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Heikki Hannikainen: "Re: Tampa Ping Pong"
Previous message: Terry Dawson: "Re: ERROR 'ax0' busy and not MOD_IN_USE."
Maybe in reply to: Benedict P. Barszcz: "rose UNSPEC"
Next in thread: Benedict P. Barszcz: "Re: rose UNSPEC"

Benedict P. Barszcz wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I wonder why I am getting something about rose UNSPEC when I do
> ifconfig rose0?
>
> Do I need something else to be able to get an equivalent protocol
> redout after ifconfig rose0?
>
> Of course my kernel is configured for ROSE, it is not even a module,
> it is compiled in staticaly.

The net-tools do not support rose.
If you look in sunsite.unc.edu/pub/Linux/apps/ham you will find a
patchkit I made against net-tools-1.32-alpha.tar.gz to support
Rose.

regards
Terry

Next message: Heikki Hannikainen: "Re: Tampa Ping Pong"
Previous message: Terry Dawson: "Re: ERROR 'ax0' busy and not MOD_IN_USE."
Maybe in reply to: Benedict P. Barszcz: "rose UNSPEC"
Next in thread: Benedict P. Barszcz: "Re: rose UNSPEC"