From: fgehyjbq@gameq.com.tw
Date: Mon Jan 31 2000 - 18:28:31 EET
I use BPQ since it gives me an alias and networking
as well. However, I wonder if it would be better to
go the DED route. I assume that with DED you can not
have an alias or any netrom switching. any suggestions?
WV7I
>Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2000 21:59:05 +1100
>From: Barry White <sefrvdl@nnov.ru>
>To: fdxlpt.txcl@lps.usp.br
>CC: terhi.victor@logonet.com
>Subject: Re: [fbb] esperate for help "RESYNC" problem on winfbb
>
>I have never been happy with the concept of BPQ & kiss mode TNCs.
>It just puts more load on the computer and takes away from the TNC the
>handling of retries, keeping track of packet acks etc. With BPQ & Kiss mode
>TNCs the computer has no idea of what is happening on the channel. Thats the
>job of the TNC.
>
>No, John, persist with DED and ESS it works very well indeed, much better than
>BPQ & Kiss.
>
>Fire extinguisher at the ready !
>
>Barry VK2AAB
>
>
-- _____ /ony Baca Hewlett Packard Co. Boise, Idaho unmy.jyigia@rele.tunk.net____TTTc____/|~~~ (_u|||_o_) \|~~~ ^^^
_______________________________________________ fbb maillist - tojzk.qmcqxqen@yacme.com http://www.f6fbb.org/mailman/listinfo/fbb
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 31 2000 - 18:50:13 EET